3/13/2024 0 Comments How to trade jsp diablo 2 with medOn April 23, 2015, Respondent expressed its readiness to participate in a conciliation conference. Respondent has replied in an informal e-mail of Apsent within the time limit. In accordance with the Rules of Procedure, paragraph 15(a), the due date for Response was April 19, 2015. In accordance with the Rules of Procedure, paragraph 14, the Center formally notified Respondent of the Request, and the Dispute resolution proceedings commenced on March 30, 2015. The Center verified that the Request together with the amendment to the Request satisfied the formal requirements of the Rules of procedure for dispute resolution proceedings for “.ch” and “.li” domain names (the “Rules of Procedure”), adopted by SWITCH, on Maand applicable in the present case. In response to a notification by the Center on Mathat the Request was administratively deficient, Claimant filed an amendment to the Request on March 26, 2015. On March 13, 2015, SWITCH transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that Respondent is listed as the holder of the domain name and providing the relevant contact details. On March 13, 2015, the Center transmitted by email to SWITCH, the “.ch” and “.li” registry, a request for verification in connection with the disputed domain name. The Request was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on March 13, 2015. The dispute concerns the following domain name. (Technical contact: Kuehrer Johannes of Neuhofen, Austria). Respondent is ooo stratos consult, Kohlhauser Martin of Moscow, Russian Federation. The PartiesĬlaimant is Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH of Ingelheim, Germany, represented by Nameshield, France. ooo stratos consult, Kohlhauser Martin Case No. WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center EXPERT DECISION Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |